SAFETY |
|
The
development of touring car requirements has taken place over the
last forty years and is clearly demonstrated by the levels of safety
and preparation that the majority of racing cars (club or
professional) attain before an event.
In the
beginning (in this case we call “the beginning” the 1960’s) the
safety regulations concerning touring cars were fairly loose to say
the least.
The closest we came to safety was to put a crash helmet on
the driver and hope that would save him or her. There weren’t
even any strict regulations for the grade of helmet and this meant
that motorcycle crash helmets were used. Changes were
needed even then. |
|
This is Doc
Merrifield. Note the
lack of rollover protection.
Also the helmet is somewhat lightweight it hardly looks like
it would protect the driver’s head if he walked into a
door.
Picture by Fred Scatley |
 |
|
The consequences of an accident in those days were somewhat
scary to say the least.
The driver as can be seen walked away.
Picture by
Fred Scatley |
|
|
Around the time that “roll bars” were introduced into single
seaters the idea of a rollcage was considered for Saloon and Touring
cars. This raised its
own problems though because now the car could roll over and the
structure would remain in place but our driver could be thrown
around like the proverbial egg in a box. It should also be noted that
these rollcages were in fact just a single braced roll “hoop”
located by the “B” post of the car. |
|
 |
The late Tom Pryce in an Escort Mexico in 1973. Note the helmet, rollcage
and you can just make out the right shoulder strap of a
harness.
Also note the
crash helmet. It now
sports a chin guard (although open face helmets are still allowed).
Picture by Andrew Kitson |
|
Now we had the rollcages, something else was needed in order
to prevent the inevitable contact with the
structure. |
Enter full
harness seat belts.
 |
|
These were three, four (as in the above picture) or five
point harnesses designed to pin the driver into the seat in the
event of an accident.
The harness sported two shoulder straps and a lap strap and
were a totally different configuration to the triangulated “road
going” seat belt. Crash
helmets were still mandatory because contact with the rollcage in an
accident was almost inevitable. In other words the rollcage
made the habitical smaller and therefore increased the chances of a
head injury. |
|
Well, we now had our rollcages and our full harness seat
belts and even good helmets (of which more later) but there was
something missing. It
was found that drivers were still suffering injuries (some sadly
fatal) because they were being thrown about in their harnesses and
therefore could still suffer trauma. Some were strangled due to
“submarining” in an accident.
This is where the driver slides down under the lap strap and
becomes strangled by the very piece of equipment designed to protect
him or her.
|
This is the FIA Approved Sparco Pro Race
seat.
 |
|
The most famous of UK brands in the 1970’s was the Corbeau GT
seat. At that time
there were no strict regulations for the construction of the seat
but it was generally a partially “wrap around” design which served
to restrict the body’s movement in both lateral and longitudinal
directions.
As can be seen in the foregoing picture these seats “wrap
around” and serve to restrict the movement of the driver’s legs and
body in an accident.
Some even have an additional head restraint bar that wraps
around the driver’s helmet and restricts whiplash.
|
|
In order to comply with FIA and MSA regulations the driver
must wear an approved helmet.
These come in various configurations including full face and
open face versions. The
FIA requires the helmet to be renewed at a maximum of every five
years and in any event if there is any damage due to wear and tear,
dropping or an accident.
In fact Scrutineers are entitled to impound a helmet that
does not comply with the FIA regulations. |
|
 |
This is the OMP "Gran Tourismo”
helmet. |
 |
This is a “Bell Mag 4” open face helmet as
worn by many Touring Car
Drivers. | |
|
Of all the testing bodies for helmets the most widely known
is the Snell Foundation and this is their story as taken from the
Snell Foundation website FAQs.
Who/What is
Snell?
William "Pete" Snell was an amateur auto racer. He died
needlessly in a racing event in 1956 when his then state-of- the-art
helmet failed utterly to protect him. His friends, including Dr
George Snively, formed the Snell Memorial Foundation to remember
Pete Snell and to encourage the development and use of truly
protective helmets.
Why wear a helmet?
Auto racing, motorcycling, bicycling, skiing and any activity
that incorporates speed, agility and a head, all impose risks of
head injury leading to death or permanent disability. Helmets are
the single most effective means of preventing these injuries.
What are the differences between the SA and M
standards?
SA Standard was designed for auto racing while M Standard was
for motorcycling and other motorsport. There are three major
differences between them:
SA standard requires flammability test while the M standard
does not;
SA standard allows narrower visual field than M standard
(Some SA helmets may not be street legal);
SA standard has rollbar impact test while M standard does
not.
|
|
When the cages were first developed the car builders used
them for what they were, a protective device. There was a lot
of resistance to the installation of cages because they served to
increase the weight of the car and raise the roll centre thus
increasing the likelihood of a roll over
accident.
People soon discovered the advantages of a full rollcage
in terms of chassis stiffness and now it is the norm for the
rollcage to be welded into the car or at the very least bolted into
the bodywork by means of weld nuts and bolts, which serves to
increase the chassis stiffness and improve the handling performance
of the car.
These rollcages are just that. They generally
include a main hoop (by the “B” post of the car) a front hoop that
follows the windscreen line and the “A” post. Door bars and
cross bracing.
In the case of the writer’s car extra bars have been added to
reinforce the suspension points and support the shoulder straps of
the harness.
|
|
Because the rollcage reduces the overall volume of the
habitical there are regulations concerning the distance from the top
of the driver’s helmet to the main and front bars and any
longitudinal bars in the cage. The FIA recognises the need for
a suite of safety equipment, which includes the
following:
a.
Rollcage
b.
Full
Harness Seat Belt
c.
Racing
Seat
d.
Fire
extinguisher
e.
Electrical cut out
switches
f. Fire Proof
overalls.
g.
Helmet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|